Trending Topic

2 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Welcome to the latest edition of touchREVIEWS in Infectious Diseases, where we continue our mission to deliver insightful, cutting-edge perspectives in infectious disease diagnosis and management. This issue offers an array of topics spanning diagnostics, service delivery innovations and preventive care, reflecting the dynamic challenges and opportunities in our field. In our first editorial, Barbara […]

3 mins

Driving Forward After COVID-19: A Call for Continued Investment in Research on Differentiated Models of HIV Service Delivery for Vulnerable Populations Globally

Danielle Giovenco, Audrey Pettifor, Linda-Gail Bekker
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Apr 23rd 2024 touchREVIEWS in Infectious Diseases. 2024;3(1):5–6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/ID.2024.3.1.2
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Differentiated service delivery (DSD) is a client-centred, responsive model of HIV care that has the potential to address structural barriers to accessing care and ultimately improve the quality of care for people living with HIV globally. Despite progress, there has been a lack of investment in understanding the impact and implementation of DSD models across specific client populations and contexts. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, accelerated innovations in healthcare access and allowed us to reimagine the way healthcare is delivered. To fully transform HIV healthcare, continued research, funding and collaboration are needed to bolster evidence for differentiated models of HIV care at scale post-COVID-19.

Keywords
2

Article

The expansion of HIV treatment access during the past two decades, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, stands as a significant accomplishment in the field of public health.1 Currently, there are an estimated 30 million people on antiretroviral treatment for HIV globally, of whom approximately 70% reside in Africa.2 Despite advancements in the provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART), challenges remain in maintaining people living with HIV (PLWH) in successful, sustainable and responsive HIV treatment programmes, which are fundamental to ending the HIV epidemic. There are approximately 9 million PLWH globally who are not receiving treatment, and among those who are receiving the treatment, approximately 30% have unsuppressed HIV viral loads.2 There is an urgent need for health systems to ensure better access and support for individuals who are not currently receiving HIV care and provide those in HIV care with opportunities to enhance their care engagement.3 The objective of this editorial is to call for research, innovation, funding and collaboration to bolster evidence for differentiated models of HIV care.

Differentiated service delivery (DSD) is “a client-centred approach that simplifies and adapts HIV services across the cascade in ways that both serve the needs of PLWH better and reduce unnecessary burdens on the health system”.4 Essentially, when a health system adopts a more responsive model of care that is tailored to the needs of various groups of PLWH, it can allocate resources more effectively, provide better access for underserved populations and deliver care in ways that effectively improve care quality.4 Models of DSD have largely been implemented in high-prevalence countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and include client-managed groups, healthcare worker-managed groups, facility-based individual models and out-of-facility individual delivery models.4 Although DSD models, including home ART delivery, have been implemented in SSA with evidence of sustained or improved clinical outcomes compared with conventional care, most programmes have been limited to clinically stable, adult clients and rarely target the unique needs of vulnerable groups.5,6 For example, adolescents and young people living with HIV (YPLWH) have historically experienced worse HIV treatment outcomes compared with their adult counterparts.7–9 In SSA, YPLWH experience significant barriers to accessing traditional HIV care services, including a lack of disclosure to family and peers; overcrowded clinics with long wait times and inflexible scheduling; a lack of confidentiality at clinics; stigma from providers, community members and peers and a lack of adolescent-friendly spaces.10–12 Implementation of DSD models may provide opportunities to confront the structural barriers that prevent YPLWH from engaging in HIV care.

Although it is apparent that vulnerable populations in SSA and globally would likely benefit from differentiated models of HIV care, there has been a lack of investment in testing innovations in DSD, evaluating the potential large-scale impact of DSD approaches and exploring considerations for DSD implementation. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, conveyed a powerful message to the world about the need to build a resilient and sustainable health system and accelerated the adoption of new ways to improve healthcare globally, including home-based and virtual healthcare services.13 For example, we conducted an evaluation of a courier home ART delivery intervention among YPLWH in Cape Town, South Africa, which was funded through a COVID-19 Emergency Response Fund from ViiV Healthcare, London, UK. From February to October 2021, we enrolled YPLWH aged 13–24 years into a pilot study, which was aimed at examining the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a courier ART delivery intervention to retain YPLWH in HIV care while reducing patient visits to the clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic (Bidirectional, Upbeat communication and Differentiated, Distanced care for Young people [BUDDY]; ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04781400).14 All participants had the option to enrol in the courier ART delivery service. We found high uptake and acceptability of the courier ART intervention as well as promising evidence for its effectiveness in increasing viral suppression. This is one of the first studies to provide home ART delivery as a model of DSD for YPLWH in SSA, and our findings indicate that there may be a promise for this delivery modality within DSD models in South Africa post-COVID-19.

There are several priority areas for investigation for DSD research, including the impact on key populations and clinically unstable patients, integration with comorbidities and co-infections and large-scale programme evaluations that incorporate implementation science designs to bolster evidence for the benefits and costs of DSD at scale.15 Research is also needed to inform DSD models across HIV treatment and prevention cascades and for novel treatment and prevention modalities, including long-acting injectable ART, which will carry unique implementation challenges.16 Although the COVID-19 pandemic has facilitated recent investment in DSD research, it is now imperative that we capitalize on this momentum and continue ‘driving forward’ to generate evidence for DSD interventions among those who stand to benefit the most. Moreover, in addition to continued investment from funders, engagement with local policy-makers, healthcare workers and PLWH is critical to obtaining policy-, organizational- and client-level support for successful DSD scale-up. The COVID-19 pandemic revolutionized health systems globally by demanding rapid innovation in the provision of accessible care and allowing us to reimagine the way healthcare is delivered. In this post-COVID-19 era, we must continue to expand the evidence base for DSD, ensuring its successful implementation and ultimately transforming HIV healthcare delivery worldwide.

3

References

List View
Grid View
1
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 El-Sadr WMHolmes CBMugyenyi Pet alScale-up of HIV treatment through PEPFAR: A historic public health achievementJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2012;60 Suppl 3:S96104DOI10.1097/QAI.0b013e31825eb27b.

2
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 WHOHIV data and Statistics2023Available atwww.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/hiv/strategic-information/hiv-data-and-statistics (Date last accessed27 October 2023).

3
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Grimsrud AWilkinson LEshun-Wilson Iet alUnderstanding engagement in HIV programmes: How health services can adapt to ensure no one is left behindCurr HIV/AIDS Rep2020;17:45866DOI10.1007/s11904-020-00522-1.

4
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Grimsrud ABygrave HDoherty Met alReimagining HIV service delivery: The role of differentiated care from prevention to suppressionJ Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19:21484DOI21484.

5
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Limbada MMacleod DSitumbeko Vet alRates of viral suppression in a cohort of people with stable HIV from two community models of ART delivery versus facility-based HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia: A cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial nested in the HPTN 071 (PopART) trialLancet HIV2022;9:e1323. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00242-3.

6
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Long LKuchukhidze SPascoe Set alRetention in care and viral suppression in differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A rapid systematic reviewJ Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23:e25640. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25640.

7
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ZumaKSimbayiLZunguNet alThe HIV epidemic in South Africa: key findings from 2017 national population-based surveyInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138125.

8
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Nglazi MDKranzer KHolele Pet alTreatment outcomes in HIV-infected adolescents attending a community-based antiretroviral therapy clinic in South AfricaBMC Infect Dis2012;12:21DOI10.1186/1471-2334-12-21.

9
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Haas ADLienhard RDidden Cet alMental health, ART adherence, and viral suppression among adolescents and adults living with HIV in South Africa: A cohort studyAIDS Behav2023;27:184961DOI10.1007/s10461-022-03916-x.

10
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Ritchwood TDBa AIngram Let alCommunity perspectives of South African adolescents’ experiences seeking treatment at local HIV clinics and how such clinics may influence engagement in the HIV treatment cascade: A qualitative studyAIDS Care2020;32:838DOI10.1080/09540121.2019.1653442.

11
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Clair-Sullivan NSMwamba CWhetham Jet alBarriers to HIV care and adherence for young people living with HIV in Zambia and mHealth. Mhealth. 2019;5:4545. DOI10.21037/mhealth.2019.09.02.

12
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 MacCarthy SSaya USamba Cet alHow am I going to live? Exploring barriers to ART adherence among adolescents and young adults living with HIV in UgandaBMC Public Health2018;18:1158DOI10.1186/s12889-018-6048-7.

13
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Yamey GPai MHow COVID-19 is revolutionizing health care around the worldTime2021Available athttps://time.com/6052677/covid-19-health-care-innovations/ (Date last accessed30 October 2023).

14
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Giovenco DPettifor AQayiya Yet alThe acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of a courier HIV-treatment delivery and SMS support intervention for young people living with HIV in South AfricaJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2023;95:1619DOI10.1097/QAI.0000000000003332.

15
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Grimsrud ABarnabas RVEhrenkranz PFord NEvidence for scale up: The differentiated care research agendaJ Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20:22024. DOI10.7448/IAS.20.5.22024.

16
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Rizzardini GOverton ETOrkin Cet alLong-acting injectable cabotegravir + rilpivirine for HIV maintenance therapy: Week 48 pooled analysis of phase 3 ATLAS and FLAIR trialsJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2020;85:498506. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002466.

4

Article Information

Disclosure

Linda-Gail Bekker has received honoraria for advisory roles on subjects unrelated to this work at Gilead Science, ViiV Healthcare and Merck Pty Ltd. Danielle Giovenco and Audrey Pettifor have no financial or non-financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article.

Compliance With Ethics

This article is an opinion piece and does not report on new clinical data, or any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Review Process

Double-blind peer review.

Authorship

The named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Correspondence

Danielle GiovencoDepartment of EpidemiologyEmory University1518 Clifton Road, AtlantaGA 30322USAdanielle.giovenco@emory.edu

Support

This work was supported by ViiV Healthcare UK (#214679) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI157855). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views of the funding agencies.The journal and journal publisher have not received any support for the publication of the article.

Access

This article is freely accessible at touchINFECTIOUSDISEASES.com © Touch Medical Media 2024.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the writing of this article.

Received

2023-11-01

5

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup